Poverty alleviation is the very foundation of 'human security'. Why, Essay

Poverty alleviation is the very foundation of 'human security'. Why, then, have we not been able to 'make poverty history' in SubSaharan Africa - Essay Example The reasons as to why action plans addressing food security in Africa have continued to fail can be accredited to defective analysis and defective actions. What is required is a comprehending which goes beyond conservative, traditional wisdom in order to work extra strategically in formulating and implementing effective and successful, global, national and also regional policies. Accessibility, availability and affordability are each aspects of food security, difficult issues which encompass a broad scope of interconnected social, economic and political issues, internal aspects and external aspects, which challenges Africa's capability to tackle food security in the continent. Ultimately hunger or lack of food is a political making which should be ended through political ways. (Rajalakshmi, 2002) Globally, the trends of food shortage are disturbing as development in reduction of hunger in the third world countries has gone down and in many regions the figures of malnourished people is really growing, in spite of the actuality that global food production has developed quicker than global population in the last 3 decades. The most recent approximates that about 840 million persons were malnourished between 1998 to 2000; 11 million people in the industrialized nations, 30 million people in nations in transition, and a whopping 799 million people in the developing countries, this is according to FAO (2002) In the 1996, World Food Summit (WFS) gave a goal of a reducing the number of starving people at least by 20 million each year from 2000 to 2015. Whilst a few regions made remarkable growth over two decades previous to 2000, signifying that food shortage is not a stubborn crisis, (World Food Summit, 2002) the recent figures on statistics of under-nourished global disclose that as from the 1996 World Food Summit, the average yearly decline has been merely 2.5 million, which is far less than the goal set by WFS of halving the figure of under-nourished people by the 2015. Advancement needs to be speed-up to 24 million people annually, approximately ten times the present pace, in order to attain that goal. (World Food Summit, 2002) Sub-Sahara Africa food shortage; is it a willful problem Economic experts revels that, the Africa's resources exceed its requirements by far, and however, there is so much food shortage. It is a paradox that countries (African) which have millions of starving people export foodstuffs to other countries which have well fed people. How is it that, Sub-Saharan African countries which are poor having a lot of starving people, appears to be capable growing food fairly plentifully What is it that will assure better food security in the sub-Sahara Africa and in deed in the whole world In1970s and 1980s, food security resolutions proposed were entirely technological, emphasizing production instead of equitable allocation of food for the people. This solution failed, since food shortage problem is not a technical problem. Population strains have been viewed as a source of world food shortage; it might be an infuriating factor, however it is not a source. Climate and Weather have also been a suitable excuse, however large quantity of food can and does exist along

The Gun Control in the USA Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

The Gun Control in the USA - Research Paper Example Most of the congresses believe that the gun control has potentially resulted in an increase in criminal cases related to the use of guns through restricting its primary deterrent which is self-defense. Statistics have it that law-abiding citizens in the United States who use their guns outnumber the criminals who use guns and the ratio has been placed at approximately 1000 to 1. This means that any withdrawal of guns from the citizens will eliminate the lawful use guns for self-defense as well as its deterrent impact (Polsby 35). The same statistics have it that most American use different types of firearms to defend and protect themselves from criminals with the figures being placed at approximately 764, 000 times yearly. The Gun control law to a larger extent conflicts with the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States which has the clause that gives citizens the right to bear firearms. The Bill of Rights guarantees citizens the right to bear and keep arms by a virt ue of a selective reading of the Bill. The federal have argued that the statement â€Å"a well-regulated militia† refers to a Free State security and most Courts of Appeal have claimed that the statement calls for the right to bear firearms to have the collective state militia’s rights and not individual rights to own weapons as they wish. The Congress came up with a law in the year 2005 that offers the gun dealers and manufactures more immunity protecting them from being sued. This followed a heavy lobbying coming from the gun industry and the NRA.... Most of the congresses believe that the gun control has potentially resulted to an increase in crime cases related to the use of guns through restricting its primary deterrent which is self defense. Statistics have it that law-abiding citizens in United States who use their guns outnumber the criminals who use guns and the ratio has been placed at approximately 1000 to 1. This means that any withdrawal of guns from the citizens will eliminate the lawful use guns for self defense as well as its deterrent impact (Polsby 35). The same statistics have it that most American use different types of firearms to defend and protect themselves from criminals with the figures being placed at approximately 764, 000 times yearly. The Gun control law to a lager extent conflicts with the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States which has the clause that gives citizens the right to bear firearms. The Bill of Rights guarantees citizens the right to bear and keep arms by a virtue of a selective reading of the Bill (Anderson 78). The federal have argued that the statement â€Å"a well regulated militia† refers to a Free State security and most Courts of Appeal have claimed that the statement calls for the right to bear fire arms to have the collective state militia’s rights and not individual rights to own weapons as they wish. The congress came up with a law in the year 2005 that offers the gun dealers and manufactures more immunity protecting them from being sued. This followed a heavy lobbying coming from the gun industry and the NRA (Block 45). The PLCAA (The protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act) protects the gun industry even if they are producing guns that can be considered unnecessarily dangerous to the common